| |
Main
Date: 15 Jul 2004 19:56:38
From: Bernie Cosell
Subject: Pro qualifier
|
Did I miss some posts? No mention whatsoever of the Pro Qualifier? Pretty
interesting, I think, all the fairly "big names" that have just retired
[and a surprising, I think, number of fairly unknowns...]. I hope the
PBA's gamble of having "recognizable faces" each week pays off..
/Bernie\
--
Bernie Cosell Fantasy Farm Fibers
bernie@fantasyfarm.com Pearisburg, VA
-- > Too many people, too few sheep <--
|
|
| |
Date: 15 Jul 2004 19:25:43
From: Darby
Subject: Re: Pro qualifier
|
I didn't hear about the final results. Do you have a web site we can check?
Thanks.
Dar
"Bernie Cosell"
> Did I miss some posts? No mention whatsoever of the Pro Qualifier?
Pretty
> interesting, I think, all the fairly "big names" that have just retired
> [and a surprising, I think, number of fairly unknowns...]. I hope the
> PBA's gamble of having "recognizable faces" each week pays off..
>
> /Bernie\
|
| | |
Date: 16 Jul 2004 01:47:32
From: Joe Zachar
Subject: Re: Pro qualifier
|
--------------000903030705090802010502
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Here is the PBA news release on the qualifier final 8.
http://www.pba.com/news/default.asp?ID=3245&Type=1
Here is the PBA news release on Tommy Delutz missing the 2004-5 season
for surgery. He will be given back his exemption in 2005-6 season.
http://www.pba.com/news/default.asp?ID=3256
Here is the PBA news release giving the #9 qualifier, Bill Rowe, Canada,
Delutz' exemption in 2004-5.
http://www.pba.com/news/default.asp?ID=3257
This means that Chris Hayden, who finished one slot below the top 50
during the season, will not get Delutz' exemption. My feeling is, since
the qualifier was for 8 exemptions, that Hayden should have gotten the
nod.
Joe Z
Darby wrote:
>I didn't hear about the final results. Do you have a web site we can check?
>Thanks.
>Dar
>
>"Bernie Cosell"
>
>
>>Did I miss some posts? No mention whatsoever of the Pro Qualifier?
>>
>>
>Pretty
>
>
>>interesting, I think, all the fairly "big names" that have just retired
>>[and a surprising, I think, number of fairly unknowns...]. I hope the
>>PBA's gamble of having "recognizable faces" each week pays off..
>>
>> /Bernie\
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
--------------000903030705090802010502
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" >
<html >
<head >
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" >
<title ></title>
</head >
<body >
Here is the PBA news release on the qualifier final 8.<br >
<br >
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.pba.com/news/default.asp?ID=3245&Type=1" >http://www.pba.com/news/default.asp?ID=3245&Type=1</a><br>
<br >
Here is the PBA news release on Tommy Delutz missing the 2004-5 season for
surgery. He will be given back his exemption in 2005-6 season.<br >
<br >
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.pba.com/news/default.asp?ID=3256" >http://www.pba.com/news/default.asp?ID=3256</a><br>
<br >
Here is the PBA news release giving the #9 qualifier, Bill Rowe, Canada,
Delutz' exemption in 2004-5.<br >
<br >
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.pba.com/news/default.asp?ID=3257" >http://www.pba.com/news/default.asp?ID=3257</a><br>
<br >
This means that Chris Hayden, who finished one slot below the top 50 during
the season, will not get Delutz' exemption. My feeling is, since the qualifier
was for 8 exemptions, that Hayden should have gotten the nod. <br >
<br >
Joe Z<br >
<br >
Darby wrote:<br >
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid10fe845m0jej3c6@corp.supernews.com" >
<pre wrap="" >I didn't hear about the final results. Do you have a web site we can check?
Thanks.
Dar
"Bernie Cosell"
</pre >
<blockquote type="cite" >
<pre wrap="" >Did I miss some posts? No mention whatsoever of the Pro Qualifier?
</pre >
</blockquote >
<pre wrap="" ><!---->Pretty
</pre >
<blockquote type="cite" >
<pre wrap="" >interesting, I think, all the fairly "big names" that have just retired
[and a surprising, I think, number of fairly unknowns...]. I hope the
PBA's gamble of having "recognizable faces" each week pays off..
/Bernie\
</pre >
</blockquote >
<pre wrap="" ><!---->
</pre >
</blockquote >
<br >
</body >
</html >
--------------000903030705090802010502--
|
| | | |
Date: 16 Jul 2004 13:55:25
From: David Carcagente
Subject: Re: Pro qualifier
|
>This means that Chris Hayden, who finished one slot below the top 50
>during the season, will not get Delutz' exemption. My feeling is, since
>the qualifier was for 8 exemptions, that Hayden should have gotten the
>nod.
>
>Joe Z
>
I agree. Delutz was already in the top 50, so due to his injury, it should
have been the next highest on the point list from last year. Had it been one
of the 8 from Tour Trials that got hurt, THEN it should have went to #9. Too
bad for a real good guy (and PBA national titlist) in Chris Hayden.
-David
#'s 2 & 35 - Once a Ranger.....always a Ranger
|
|
